Common, this is the software corruption – La Provincia Pavese

 PAVIA

 

 Shared now it is working with a software corruption. Introduced a system for the management of administrative practices which breaks down each task based on the risk of corruption and highlights act after act all the provisions and all the dangers. It ‘was the Secretary General Carmelo Fontana, responsible for the prevention of corruption at Mezzabarba, who introduced and now municipal employees are doing training courses to learn how to use it.

 

 “For the moment – he explains the Head of Staff Angela Gregorini – are making the training relevant employees, but it is the intention of the administration to extend the courses to all staff.” The new software in fact allows city employees to have a handbook on procedures more correct practice to practice, highlighting critical issues and the best procedure to follow.

 

 “It is a specific system – explains the minister for Legality Giacomo Galazzo – specially designed to avoid critical procedures that reminds employees at every practice where they could nest critical. Another important point on which we are working “whistleblowing”, a project that protects the employee who report abuse. ” It is one of the measures taken in the anti corruption plan of the Municipality of Pavia (twenty-five pages available on the corporate website) and introduced into Italian law, by an Act of 2012. Essentially, the Mezzabarba employees who become aware of incidents regarding breaches of the law have the right / freedom to report them, even while maintaining the anonymity of reporting.

 

 If, however, the report bears the name and surname of the employee, the employee can not be discriminated against for having reported what he knew. Contact the individual employee will be responsible for their (so service executives or industry) or the Office disciplinary proceedings. Applying the criteria contained in the National Anti-Corruption Plan, for example,

Pavia found that the risk of corruption is medium-high for career progression (11.5), the award of work services and supplies (12), the granting assignments of collaboration (10), while the average for sub-contracts or variations during performance of the contract (6).