Saturday, June 6, 2015

Agricultural aid, scam from 81.5 mln. Since the acquired software to … – Affaritaliani.it

agriculture 2

They sold software licenses inflating prices due to double billing issued through the creation of joint “nominee”. At the center of the scam Ever owned 51% by ‘AGEA, Agency for disbursement for agriculture, and 49% by private shareholders (Agriconsulting SpA, Agrifuturo, Almaviva SpA, Auselda AED Group, Cooprogetti, IBM Italy SpA, Telespazio holder platform manages the reporting of Community aid in the agricultural sector, which amounted to about 7 billion euro a year.

 Five people were reported, between legal representatives and managers of the companies, for the crime of aggravated fraud against the State in competition with each other. The financiers of the Special Public spending and repression Community fraud seized real estate and financial assets valued at 1.5 million Euros. Order issued by the magistrate of the Court of Rome, Alessandro Arturi, at the request of the local attorney.

 The Core, at the conclusion of the investigation coordinated by the deputy prosecutor Nello Rossi and by the deputy prosecutor Alberto Pioletti, found that “the leaders of the subsidiary Sin spa, in violation of government procurement and transparency in public administration, have a direct award contract for the acquisition of these licenses. “

 And ‘found out later that “the operation’ was thought out so as to interpose between the seller and buyer final two further companies which have licenses rifatturato applying profit margins so that the price actually paid by Agea, for the ‘ purchase of the property, has risen by as much 843,000 euro. ” With reference to the higher costs incurred by Agea, then by the state, the further investigation carried out through the banking inquiries and technical, have allowed to ascertain that “the legal representative of a company interposed downgraded, in the immediacy of the conclusion of the contract, 370 thousand euro to a manager of the selling company. The transfer was apparently justified by the signing of a preliminary contract of sale real estate, which provided a deposit of the same amount. ” Surveys have allowed to verify the non-signing of the final contract. E ‘was also established that the legal representative of one of the companies intermediaries failed to indicate, in the statements for the years 2011 and 2012, income of 1.8 million euro. The total seizure undertaken equivalent to the profit generated from the entire operation.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment